BY ANTHONY DOUIN |
Thirty years after the guns fell silent at Appomattox Court House veterans of both the North and the South were still engaged in combat of a sort. That was to establish themselves in what they considered their rightful place in the history of the war. for the Union. Some cynic has defined history as a story that everyone had agreed upon, but in the post Civil War many veterans dif�fered over what happened in this or that battle and who did what during it. It is not surpris�ing that many veterans were quick to defend not only their personal role in the war, but also that of their regiment. Lewis Selbing in his GAR uniform,
photo courtesy of Tom McDonald. One such person was Lewis Selbing of Augusta. He was a wounded veteran who had enlisted in Company B, one of the Augusta companies of the Third Maine Infantry in June of 1861. Selbing was a native of Barvia in Germany and was of Jewish heritage. He had had come to the United States in the 1850s and had lived for a time in upstate New York when he moved to Maine and settled in Augusta, where he became a cit�izen in 1858. In 1860,he married Esther Bonne. When war broke out, Selbing was a mill hand at the cotton mill and this new citizen and
newly married man enlisted in
the Third Maine to fight for his
adopted country. He. rose to the
rank of corporal and faithful�ly served in many
battles. He was wounded and captured at the
Second Battle of Bull Run in August 1862. He was exchanged in time to be with the Third in the Battle
of Chanchellorsville where he received a
wound that could have ended
his military service. How�ever,
it never ended his devotion to his regiment. After the war, Selbing was active in both the Union veteran organization, the Grand Army of the Republic, as well as the
Third Maine Regiment Association. In December of 1895, a letter in the Kennebec Journal from the Maine Adjutant General caught his attention. Gen. Selden Connor, himself a Civil War veteran and brevetted gen�eral, wrote the KJ seeking infor�mation on a very sensitive' sub�ject. That was the loss of the colors on flags of the Third Maine in 1863. To understand just how controversial bringing this up was, one must first understand the role the colors played in a regiment. First of all, a Civil War regiment usually carried two flags � the national colors and state colors. They were very large flags, which were big enough so the soldiers in the regiment could easily follow them in the smoke and con�fusion of battle and the officers in the army could easily spot them on the battlefield so they would know where a regiment was located. But the flags of a Civil War regiment meant much, much more than the functional use. For the regiment's identity and soul were
embodied in the col�ors. Many times
these flags were presented in grand
cere�monies in the towns where the regiment was raised and sent off to the front.
Thus, to lose a color to the enemy
was a great calamity; and to protect it, the colors had its own guard. The color
guard consisted of a sergeant who was
selected for his gallantry and
military bear�ing to carry the regiment's col�ors. He was accompanied by five
corporals, also noted for their
military conduct and brav�ery. The color guard was posted on the left of the right center company. Being part of the color guard called for great bravery as it would be the focus of the
concentrated fire of the enemy and the
color guard must also protect the colors with their lives. It was a matter of
fact that in the battles of Chancellorsville and Gettysburg, both the Third,'
s national and state colors were
captured by the Confederates.
Selbing wrote to the Maine Adjutant General to explain how the Third Maine lost its
flag at Chancellorsville. The battle was
fought on the first three
days of May of 1862 in a particularly nasty
piece of the Virginian landscape, called
the Wilderness. It was a massive area of second-growth trees and vegetation, making it thickly wooded and dense and not suit�ed at all for the linear tactics of the era when regiments fought in long lines. Why the two opposing armies faced
each other there is explained by the fact that Wildeness lies upriver on the Rappahancock River from a city called Fredricks-burg. Earlier in December, the armies of Robert E. Lee and Ambrose Burnside clashed there with Burnside's Army of the Potomac dashing itself against the shoals of entrenchment filled with Confederate soldiers backed by artillery. Wave
after wave bravely charged
against these works, sustaining
terrific casualties but not
budging Lee's army a bit. This
failure caused Burnside to be replaced by Gen. Joseph Hooker, who was known in the army as "Fighting Joe." He planned to defeat Lee and to destroy his army by moving the Army of the Potomac upriver and then crossing swiftly and moving
through the Wilderness. Once they
were in the open and having now
flanked Lee's entrenchments, Lee
would be forced to leave them and face Hooker
and his army in the open where Hooker
reasoned Lee's army would then be destroyed. Leaving a portion of his army to face Lee, Hooker was able to steal a march on Lee and got his army up and across the Rappahancock before Lee knew what he was up to. Once alerted,
Lee moved decisively. He left just a brigade to
man the Fredrickburg's entrench�ments and moved the rest of the 'army to confront the Army of the
Potomac. Lead elements of both armies clashed
just inside the Wilderness. This
action caused Hooker to make a fateful decision. He halted the army in the Wilderness in expectation that he
would fin�ish off Lee the next day.
In the meantime, Lee had learned that Hooker's
right flank was alone and
unsupported by the rest of the Union
Army. He ordered his famous Lt. Stonewall
Jack�son to attack and destroy Hooker's army. And he nearly did. The right flack was held by the
Eleventh Corps led by Third Maine's former
Col. Oliver O. Howard. Near dusk, Jackson's men slammed into the llth Corps routing it completely. Now Hooker was com�pelled to save his army by launching a series of counter attacks. One of these ordered at midnight involved Lewis Sel�bing and the Third Maine. Thus it was that the Third charged in the dense woods of the Wilderness and with the rest of the brigade carried the rebel position. In the darkness and the confusion of combat, however, the color bearer with the state flag got separated and wandered into the Confeder�ate's lines and both he and the flag were captured. Selbing didn't
personally witness this as he was
with the rest of the regiment; he was later told this by the color bearer. Early the next morning as
the Third Maine was ordered to
return to the Union lines, it came
under artillery fire. A shell shredded
Selbing's left arm and killed his company
commander, Warren Cox of Augusta. Sel�bing was evacuated to a field hospital where his arm was amputated
above the elbow. He was discharged
for disability in November 1863 and returned to Augusta. He worked at the Ken-nebec Arsenal for a time. He then went into the fruit and con�fectionary business on Water Street and later operated a stand at the Statehouse. He finally became a pension agent helping other Civil War
veterans obtain their pensions. He was active in the Seth Williams Grand Army Post
becoming commander in 1889 and was
quartermaster for the post for many
years. He died in 1910, His widow,
Esther, in applying for a widow's
pension furnished several testimonials proving her marriage to
him. One stated that they had lived happily together as man and wife and
raised up a family. ��
Their marriage
resulted in the birth of six children, five of whom were living at the time
of their father�s death. This writer's grandmother grew on Capitol Street around the corner from the Selbing home at 109 Sewall St. She often saw the old veteran with the emp? sleeve in the street and he would in variably greet her with the words, "So vat do you tink the Thurd Maine?" |
Antiquarian Notebook |
page A10 Capital Weekly �� www.MaineCoastNOW.com |
last updated : Dec 9, 2008